用於報酬方向的 XGBoost:類別不平衡與決策閾值
報酬方向分類器是不平衡問題,而 0.5 是錯誤的決策閾值。比較加密貨幣資料上的 scale_pos_weight、焦點損失與精確率約束閾值最佳化,以及 XGBoost、LightGBM 和 CatBoost 之間的工程差異。
Nothing found. Try a different query.
報酬方向分類器是不平衡問題,而 0.5 是錯誤的決策閾值。比較加密貨幣資料上的 scale_pos_weight、焦點損失與精確率約束閾值最佳化,以及 XGBoost、LightGBM 和 CatBoost 之間的工程差異。
DCC-GARCH tells you when crypto dependence tightens. Transfer entropy tells you which way it points. A directed information-flow measure, its null calibration, and an honest account of what it does and does not add over average pairwise correlation.
從 OHLCV、棒歷史資料或沒有攻擊方標記的交易場所重建交易方向——經典規則、過時報價問題、批量成交量分類,以及如何用加密市場免費提供的真實標籤測量它們。
餵入逐筆資料的序列模型仍假設間隔規則。本文介紹三種告訴 Transformer 某筆成交實際發生時間的方法——可學習時間尺度的連續編碼、ODE-RNN 潛在狀態,以及把 delta_t 作為一般特徵——並以消融實驗決定它們之間的取捨。
This series has priced the selection route to a false edge — DSR prices the winner, PBO prices the search. Neither touches confounding: the strategy that made money because volatility doubled the week you deployed it. The Synthetic Control Method builds a weighted counterfactual from a donor pool of untouched instruments and gives you a falsification criterion and a placebo p-value.
How to evaluate a predictive distribution honestly — CRPS as a proper scoring rule, the PIT histogram as a calibration diagnostic, and DeepAR sampling in GluonTS.
Putting the Heston, free-boundary, and jump-diffusion pricing PDEs into a neural network loss — the log-price residual, the mixed-partial autograd trick, and what still needs measuring.
How PCMCI's two-stage MCI test recovers directed causal links between crypto assets where correlation and bivariate Granger cannot — the construction, the tigramite pipeline, and the real-data study it still needs.
Turning raw book updates into a signed flow quantity: the CKS event decomposition, multi-level OFI with PCA reduction, and Lee-Ready trade classification — plus an honest accounting of what the headline R-squared actually measures.
Neural ODEs, Neural SDEs and continuous normalizing flows for irregularly-sampled market data — and the one ablation that decides whether continuous dynamics are worth their solver cost.
Does jointly predicting return, volume, and volatility actually help? Measuring loss-balancing schemes and diagnosing negative transfer through gradient cosine similarity — with a classical baseline and purged walk-forward folds.
Magnitude and structured pruning, the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis, movement pruning, distillation and 2:4 sparsity — the methods behind shrinking a trading model, and what still has to be measured before any of it ships.